Losing a job is never easy, but when you lose your job because your employer did not respect your rights, or as a result of retaliation for speaking out about legitimate concerns regarding your work environment, the experience can be gut-wrenching. You have the right to a safe work environment that is free from discrimination, and you have the right to speak up for yourself and for coworkers who are being treated unfairly without being fired for it. If you suspect your termination was based on discrimination, retaliation, or a violation of public policy, know that you have the right to demand answers.
Firings that lead to a wrongful termination case commonly follow:
If you were wrongfully terminated, our employment law firm is prepared to work to achieve the best possible outcome for your case. Jeremy Pasternak has represented employees throughout California for more than 20 years from offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles, and has been named a Northern California Super Lawyer every year since 2008. He takes wrongful termination cases through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and trial, consultations are free, and you pay no fee unless we win.
Wrongful termination occurs when an employer fires an employee in a way that violates an employment contract, public policy, or anti-discrimination laws. Although California is an at-will employment state under Labor Code section 2922, which means that employers can generally terminate employees for any reason or no reason at all, there are exceptions that protect workers from unlawful dismissal.
An employer breaks the law when it:
An unfair firing is not always an unlawful one. An employer can let you go for poor performance, a personality conflict with a manager, or a company-wide layoff, and even when the decision feels unjust, those reasons are lawful. A wrongful termination case has to show that the reason behind the firing violated a specific law or public policy, and that is where an experienced employment attorney can evaluate the facts and tell you whether your termination crossed that line.
California law provides four separate legal bases for a wrongful termination case, and a single firing can fit more than one of them. Which basis applies depends on the reason behind the firing, and an experienced employment attorney can determine which of them your termination violated.
The California Supreme Court recognizes four sources of public policy that support a wrongful termination case:
For the policy to qualify, it has to come from a constitution, statute, or regulation, serve the public at large, and have been in place at the time of the firing (Stevenson v. Superior Court, 1997). An employer's internal handbook rules do not qualify, and a dispute over the terms of your own contract belongs in a breach of contract case.
A wrongful termination case in California rests on one of the following grounds, and the evidence you need depends on which one applies to your firing.
California law forbids an employer with five or more employees from firing you because of a protected characteristic. The Fair Employment and Housing Act protects race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, pregnancy, age (40 and over), physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, reproductive health decisions, and military or veteran status. Since January 1, 2025, FEHA also protects any combination of those characteristics, so a firing that targets you for being, for example, both over 40 and a woman is unlawful even if the employer treats older men and younger women fairly. A workplace discrimination firing also violates federal law when the employer has 15 or more employees (20 for age discrimination).
Employers cannot fire workers for participating in protected activities. A firing is unlawful retaliation when the reason behind it is that you:
A 2024 amendment to the Labor Code helps when the firing came soon after your complaint. If your employer fires you within 90 days of a wage complaint, a whistleblower report, or an equal pay complaint, Labor Code sections 98.6, 1102.5, and 1197.5 create a rebuttable presumption that the firing was retaliation, and the employer has to prove it had a legitimate reason unrelated to your complaint.
Labor Code section 1102.5 protects you when you report a violation of a state or federal law, rule, or regulation to a government agency, to a supervisor, or to another employee with authority to investigate or correct the problem. You do not have to be right about the violation; you need reasonable cause to believe one occurred. Reports of environmental, safety, securities, wage, and healthcare violations are covered, and so is refusing to take part in an activity that would break the law. An employer that fires a whistleblower faces reinstatement, back pay, a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation, and your attorney's fees.
An employer that fires you in violation of the terms of your employment contract, particularly provisions that set when and how you can be terminated, is liable for wrongful termination. Firing you before the contract term ends or without the notice the contract requires counts as a breach.
A contract does not have to be written. An implied contract can arise from an employee handbook that promises progressive discipline, assurances from a manager that your job was secure, and a long record of raises and promotions, although an at-will clause you signed in an offer letter makes an implied contract harder to prove. Every California employment contract also includes an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which an employer breaches when it fires you to avoid paying a commission or bonus you had already earned.
Quitting does not end your case if your employer forced the resignation. Constructive discharge occurs when an employer deliberately creates or knowingly allows working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable employee in your position would have no option other than to resign (Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 1994). A single unfair review or a pay cut does not meet the standard, while a series of demotions, harassment, or unsafe assignments that continues after you complain can. Once you prove constructive discharge, the resignation is treated as a firing, and you can pursue the same discrimination, retaliation, or public policy case as an employee who was fired outright.
Both are illegal under California law, but each one gets proven differently, and a resignation that your employer forced in retaliation for a complaint can support both.
Constructive dismissal, also called constructive discharge, comes from California common law (CACI No. 2510) and applies when an employer forces you to resign by creating working conditions so intolerable that you feel resignation is your only option. To prove it, you have to show that a reasonable employee in your position would have felt compelled to quit, and that your employer intended to force the resignation or knew about the conditions and let them continue. Constructive discharge on its own is not a case; it converts your resignation into a firing, and you still have to prove the firing was unlawful for one of the reasons a wrongful termination case requires, like discrimination or retaliation.
Retaliatory firing is prohibited under Labor Code section 1102.5, the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It occurs when an employer terminates you for engaging in protected activity, which violates both California and federal law.
Protected activity covers the following, and the list is representative:
Labor Code section 1102.5 also forbids an employer, or anyone acting for it, from:
To prove retaliation, you show three things:
Labor Code section 1102.6 sets the burden of proof in your favor. You have to show by a preponderance of the evidence that your protected activity was a contributing factor in the firing, and the employer then has to prove by clear and convincing evidence that it would have fired you anyway for a legitimate reason (Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., 2022). A firing within 90 days of a wage, whistleblower, or equal pay complaint starts with a presumption of retaliation, and an employer that offers a lawful explanation has to support it with evidence.
Termination shortly after protected conduct is a strong sign of retaliation, and Jeremy Pasternak gathers the emails, performance reviews, and witness accounts that connect the timing to the decision to fire you.
An employer that fires you for a prohibited reason does not usually say so. The termination letter cites performance, restructuring, or a policy violation, and your case depends on whether that stated reason was the true one or a substitute for a reason the law prohibits. Proving a substitute reason, which the law calls pretext, relies on circumstantial evidence, and the following signs are where that evidence usually comes from:
Your personnel file is the first test of the employer's story. Labor Code section 1198.5 requires an employer to let you inspect and copy your personnel records within 30 calendar days of a written request, and section 226 gives you your payroll records within 21 days. A file that contains no warning before the firing, or a warning dated after it, contradicts a performance explanation.
Jeremy Pasternak investigates the signs together: he requests the personnel file, compares how the employer treated coworkers, and takes the depositions of the managers who made the decision to test whether the stated reason survives questioning under oath.
Your employer cannot fire you for taking leave protected by the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) or the California Family Rights Act (CFRA). You do not have to name either law when you ask for time off; telling your employer the reason for the leave is enough to trigger the protection.
CFRA (Gov. Code section 12945.2) covers employers with five or more employees, and you qualify after 12 months and 1,250 hours of work. It provides up to 12 weeks of job-protected leave in a 12-month period for:
You are entitled to return to the same or a comparable position. Pregnancy disability leave (Gov. Code section 12945) adds up to four months for a pregnancy-related disability at employers with five or more employees, separate from CFRA bonding leave, so a new mother can take both.
A firing for taking or requesting protected leave supports a FEHA case and a public policy case, even when you had not yet started the leave. An employer can still eliminate your position during leave for an unrelated reason, like a layoff that would have reached you anyway, but it has to prove that reason. Paid Family Leave pays partial wages while you are out and does not protect your job. If you were fired around a pregnancy, family, or medical leave, Jeremy Pasternak reviews the leave request, the employer's response, and the timing of the termination to establish the connection between the two.
The California Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act (Labor Code sections 1400-1408) protects employees when an employer cuts a large part of its workforce at once. An employer that has employed 75 or more people in the past 12 months has to give 60 days' written notice to affected employees, their representatives, and the state before:
Since January 1, 2026, the notice also has to state whether the employer will coordinate Rapid Response reemployment services through the local workforce development board and has to include information about CalFresh food benefits.
An employer that skips or shortens the notice owes each affected employee up to 60 days of back pay and benefits, plus a civil penalty of up to $500 a day, which the employer avoids only by paying the employees in full within three weeks of the layoff.
WARN governs the notice, not the reason for the layoff, so a WARN violation is a separate case from wrongful termination and the two can be brought together. A layoff that reaches only you, or only the employees who complained or took leave, raises the question of whether the layoff was a pretext for a firing the law prohibits, and Jeremy Pasternak examines who was selected and why before treating a layoff as lawful.
State and federal laws give you the following rights at work, and the list is representative. Being fired for exercising any of them can support a wrongful termination case.
Even if you are in the process of being terminated or suspect that you are about to be terminated, do not hesitate to contact a wrongful termination attorney in San Francisco to discuss your rights and options.
To win a wrongful termination case, you generally have to prove four things, which track the jury instruction a judge reads at trial (CACI No. 2430):
A substantial motivating reason does not have to be the only reason. An employer that fired you for a mix of lawful and unlawful reasons still loses if the unlawful reason was a substantial factor in the decision, and in a whistleblower case the standard drops further to a contributing factor.
Documentation proves the third element. Emails and text messages, performance reviews, your personnel file, the termination letter, witness statements from coworkers, and the employer's own written policies each show whether the stated reason for the firing matches what the employer did. Harm, the fourth element, covers the wages and benefits you lost after the firing and the emotional distress the firing caused.
The deadline for a wrongful termination case depends on which law the firing violated, and one firing can carry several deadlines at once. The most common ones are:
| Type of case | Deadline |
|---|---|
| Discrimination or retaliation under FEHA | Three years from the firing to file a complaint with the Civil Rights Department, then one year to sue after the CRD issues a right-to-sue notice (Gov. Code sections 12960 and 12965) |
| Discrimination or retaliation under federal law (Title VII, ADA, ADEA) | 300 days from the firing to file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, then 90 days to sue after the EEOC issues a notice of right to sue |
| Wrongful termination in violation of public policy | Two years from the firing (Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1) |
| Whistleblower retaliation under Labor Code section 1102.5 | Generally three years from the firing (Code of Civil Procedure section 338) |
| Retaliation complaint with the Labor Commissioner | One year from the firing (Labor Code section 98.7) |
| Breach of an oral employment contract | Two years (Code of Civil Procedure section 339) |
| Breach of a written employment contract | Four years (Code of Civil Procedure section 337) |
A FEHA case cannot go to court until the CRD issues a right-to-sue notice, and in employment cases you can request that notice immediately without waiting for an investigation, which is what an attorney does when the case is ready to be filed. The one-year period after the notice is paused during mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution, and since January 1, 2026, during a timely appeal of a CRD decision to close your complaint. A charge filed with the EEOC is treated as filed with the CRD as well, and the reverse, so one filing preserves both the state and federal case.
Circumstances can extend or shorten a deadline. The CRD period extends by up to 90 days if you learned the facts behind the firing after it happened, and a written agreement with the employer to extend the deadline pauses it. Jeremy Pasternak calculates every deadline that applies to a firing at the first consultation, because a case with three possible bases can lose one of them a year before the others expire.
Compensation in a California wrongful termination case starts with the pay you lost. Back pay covers the wages, raises, and overtime you would have earned from the firing through the verdict, and front pay covers what you would have earned going forward when returning to the job is not workable. Both are reduced by what you earned, or could have earned with reasonable effort, in a comparable job, and the employer has to prove that comparable work was available and that you did not pursue it.
Beyond lost pay, you can recover:
FEHA places no cap on compensatory or punitive damages. Title VII caps combined compensatory and punitive damages between $50,000 and $300,000 depending on the size of the employer, which is why a California employee's recovery usually comes through the state case.
Your final paycheck is separate from all of the above. Labor Code section 201 makes every wage you have earned, including accrued vacation, due on the day you are fired, and an employer that pays late owes a penalty of a full day's wages for each day of delay, up to 30 days (Labor Code section 203).
The weeks after a firing are when a case gets built or damaged, and the damage usually comes from one of the following:
An employer that offers severance in exchange for a release of your right to sue has to follow Gov. Code section 12964.5. The offer has to tell you in writing that you have the right to consult an attorney, and it has to give you at least five business days to do so. The agreement cannot bar you from talking about unlawful conduct at work, including harassment, discrimination, or retaliation, and a clause that bars the employer from ever rehiring you is void in the settlement of an employment dispute (Code of Civil Procedure section 1002.5).
A severance offer is the employer's first offer, and the amount and the terms can be negotiated. Jeremy Pasternak reviews severance offers against the value of the case they would release, and negotiates severance and executive separation agreements for employees at every level.
Losing your job because of discrimination, retaliation, or an employer that ignored the law is devastating, and the Law Offices of Jeremy Pasternak is committed to getting you the answers and the accountability you deserve. Jeremy Pasternak has represented employees in San Francisco, the Bay Area, and throughout California for more than 20 years, has been named a Northern California Super Lawyer every year since 2008, and represents wrongfully fired employees from offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles.
From the first consultation through the end of the case, he will:
Consultations are free and confidential, and you pay no fee unless we win. If you were fired in San Francisco or anywhere in California and suspect the reason was unlawful, call (415) 693-0300 in San Francisco or (213) 797-5823 in Los Angeles, or use the contact form to schedule your consultation.
If you are meeting with one of our wrongful termination lawyers for a consultation, bring as many of the following items as you can, to help us better understand your situation and evaluate your case:
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this content does not create an attorney-client relationship with The Law Offices of Jeremy Pasternak. Employment law varies by state and situation, and legal outcomes depend on specific facts and applicable laws. While we make every effort to ensure accuracy, laws change, and unintended errors or omissions may occur. For advice on your particular circumstances, consult an attorney.