FMLA harassment occurs when an employer interferes with, discourages, or retaliates against an employee for requesting or taking leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act. In California, employees are protected from this by both the federal FMLA and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA). Violations of either law can justify a lawsuit against an employer.
If you believe your employer has violated your FMLA or CFRA rights, contact the Law Offices of Jeremy Pasternak today for a free consultation.
To qualify for FMLA leave, all of the following need to be true:
FMLA thresholds leave out a significant number of California workers, particularly those at smaller companies. Fortunately for workers, state law can fill the gap. California's CFRA applies to employers with five or more employees, meaning workers who fall outside federal FMLA coverage may still have protected leave rights under state law.
FMLA harassment generally falls into one of two categories: interference and retaliation.
Interference happens before or during leave. It covers any employer conduct that blocks, discourages, or conditions an employee's ability to take protected time off. Examples may include:
An employer doesn't need to intend harm for an interference to count as a violation. If the conduct discouraged or prevented the employee from using their rights, it qualifies.
Retaliation happens after an employee takes their leave. This may look like an employer who, upon return of the employee:
California looks closely at timing in possible FMLA violations. An adverse action taken shortly after an employee returns from leave can be enough to support a retaliation case.
Interference and retaliation are both prohibited under the FMLA and the CFRA, and either can justify a lawsuit.
A third circumstance that doesn't always fit neatly into either category is workplace hostility, a change in how the employee is treated that stops short of a formal adverse action but is clearly connected to the leave. For example:
Examples of behavior alone may not constitute a violation, but documented together alongside a leave period, they can support a broader harassment case.
Intermittent FMLA leave allows employees to take protected time off in separate blocks rather than all at once, which can be necessary for chronic health conditions, treatments, or recurring caregiving responsibilities. An employee managing a condition like cancer, Crohn's disease, or severe migraines may need to take a few hours or a day at a time, unpredictably, over the course of months.
Employers may find intermittent leave more disruptive than a single continuous absence, and that frustration sometimes leads to pressure on the employee. An employer may respond to the absences by making the employee feel guilty, questioning the legitimacy of each absence, or tracking their leave in ways not applied to other employees.
Scrutiny can cross into harassment quickly. An employee on intermittent leave who starts receiving writeups for attendance, gets pulled from projects, or finds their leave requests suddenly met with skepticism may be experiencing interference or retaliation under the FMLA and CFRA.
California's CFRA raises the floor that the federal FMLA sets, and it does so in several important ways.
Employer coverage is the most significant difference. FMLA applies to employers with 50 or more employees within a 75-mile radius, the CFRA applies to employers with just five or more employees, which brings a much larger portion of California's workforce under protected leave rights.
Qualifying reasons for leave are also broader under the CFRA. Beyond the conditions covered by the FMLA, California's law covers leave to care for grandparents, grandchildren, siblings, and domestic partners, none of whom are recognized under federal law.
Pregnancy-related conditions are also treated separately under the CFRA, which gives California employees additional protected leave on top of their standard 12 weeks.
For employees at companies with 50 or more employees, both laws apply and their protections layer on top of each other. At companies with fewer than 50 employees, the FMLA does not apply, but the CFRA still does for any employer with at least five employees, and an employer who ignores that distinction is still liable under state law.
Attorneys at the Law Offices of Jeremy Pasternak start by establishing a chronology of events:
A performance rating that was satisfactory before the leave and unsatisfactory after it, with no documented issues in between, is the kind of discrepancy that connects an adverse action to the leave itself.
Pasternak Law collects and reviews:
A measurable difference between how the employee was rated or treated before and after leave is what establishes that the employer's conduct was tied to the leave, not to legitimate performance concerns.
Employers will typically argue that any adverse action was taken for a legitimate, unrelated reason. Pasternak Law examines whether that explanation is credible by looking at:
Pasternak Law has represented California employees in FMLA and CFRA cases for over 25 years, across industries and at all levels of employment. Most cases resolve before trial, but when an employer refuses to offer a fair resolution, Pasternak Law is prepared to take the case to court.
Protected leave is a right the law guarantees, and an employer who responds to that leave with pressure, demotion, hostility, or termination has crossed a line that California and federal law both recognize. Employers seldom admit the connection between an adverse action and a leave period, which is why documentation, chronology, and attorney experience are the deciding factors in FMLA and CFRA cases.
If your employer demoted you, terminated you, or made your work environment hostile after you took protected leave, you may have a case under the FMLA, the CFRA, or both. Call the FMLA attorneys of Law Offices of Jeremy Pasternak at 415-693-0300 or fill out our contact form for a free consultation to discuss what happened and whether the evidence supports a case.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this content does not create an attorney-client relationship with The Law Offices of Jeremy Pasternak. Employment law varies by state and situation, and legal outcomes depend on specific facts and applicable laws. While we make every effort to ensure accuracy, laws change, and unintended errors or omissions may occur. For advice on your particular circumstances, consult an attorney.